Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 

Author Topic: WATCHMEN 2?  (Read 538 times)

JOE SOAP

  • Member
  • Bionic Fingers
  • *****
  • Posts: 7890
  • BREAKIN' HEADS SINCE '75.
    • View Profile
WATCHMEN 2?
« on: 03 February, 2010, 11:03:03 PM »


It's cursing time for Magus Moore...

Quote

Get Ready For Watchmen 2

Submitted by Rich Johnston on February 3, 2010 – 3:00 pm (28) comments
I’ve heard this one rumbling for a while now. First there was the story that DC Comics Publisher and President Paul Levitz had personally prevented any Watchmen 2 projects, because, despite their differences, he believed that as this would be against Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’ wishes, it would cause bery bad feeling in the creative community and would be a creatively bankrupt move.

Moore fell out massively with DC Comics, and Paul Levitz specifically, not only choosing not to work with them any further, but scuppering spinoff projects, removing his name from any movie credits and any money due to him from said movies, and taking his one final project The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen, from Wildstorm, a publisher DC had purchased.

But in the wake of the movie, Watchmen the comic became DC’s best selling publication of all time. One might say partly because it had remained undiluted after all this time.

But there were moves. A Wizard splash showing DC’s Countdown multiverse had Rorschach as one of the combatants and it was rumoured one of the universes in the DC 52 Multiverse was intended to be the Watchmen world. Instead, Earth 4 became a world inspired by elements of Watchmen and the Charlton Heroes universe but with other aspects such as the laws of physics being altered.

But the news broke that Paul Levitz was stepping down from DC Comics as both President and Publisher, I wondered what that meant for the possibility of a Watchmen sequel. Certainly in a hundred years, you couldn’t expect there not to be one.

Well, it seems to be happening a lot sooner than I thought. I understand now that this considered a pet project of Dan DiDio, SVP-Executive Editor. That he is determined to impress new bosses by building on DC’s biggest selling comic book of all time with multiple prequel comic miniseries and spinoff ongoing projects.

I understand that both Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons have to be offered first refusal before any of these titles could be published. But if they don’t want to work on them themselves (and Alan Moore is never going to agree), DiDio has been sounding out people who might be willing to take on the task.

While some creators are reticent, the argument goes if there are a number of Watchmen spinoff projects, any blame or shame can be spread on many shoulders. The sales are expected to be massive, whatever the hardcore fanboy reaction and such expected sales benefits will be shared amongst the creative teams.

In contrast, not only would Levitz not allow any new Watchmen stories but even the video game was restricted to material in the graphic novel and film, nothing brand new was allowed to be invented. Despite differences with Moore, Levitz has held fast to the committment that the comic is the comic is the comic.

It seems that this may now change.

At this stage, having disowned himself of much of it, Alan Moore is likely not to care. Though we might get an eviscerating blast at some point if this all comes to pass.

Both Jim Baike, Rich Veitch and Gene Ha/Zander Cannon are artists who have taken on writing chores on books previously written by Alan Moore, to continue the storyline. The most creatively-acceptable solution would be Dave Gibbons writing and drawing new Watchmen titles. But DiDio’s plans seem much larger than just one book.

And of course, in those initial movie contracts with Fox, there was a clause that included sequels to a Watchmen movie.

When asked, Dave Gibbons only replied “Hurm…”




http://www.bleedingcool.com/2010/02/03/get-ready-for-watchmen-2/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+BleedingCool+%28Bleeding+Cool+Comic+News+%26+Rumors%29&utm_content=Twitter

Colin_YNWA

  • Member
  • Bionic Fingers
  • *****
  • Posts: 5074
    • View Profile
Re: WATCHMEN 2?
« Reply #1 on: 04 February, 2010, 08:47:41 AM »
Yeah saw that last night. It'll take a very bold creative team (assuming Dave Gibbons isn't interested which seems a safe bet) to take this on. That said I suspect there's ego enough out there to get it done.

Its always been a credit to Paul Levitz that for all the falling out etc he had with Moore he respected his magnus opus this way. Didn't take long after him leaving for that to change did it! Still no point judging things until anything is confirmed and we can see the quality of anything produced. Mind however good it was there'd be some folk up in arms I'd guess.

So does Matt Smith follow this led and commission Halo Jones Book IV... nahhhhh

PsychoGoatee

  • Member
  • Sentient Tea Bot
  • **
  • Posts: 340
  • Drokk it!!
    • View Profile
Re: WATCHMEN 2?
« Reply #2 on: 05 February, 2010, 05:35:15 AM »
This is madness, and it's blasphemy, and all that jazz.

I'm fine with sequels since if they're bad or if I wish they weren't made, I can just ignore them in the future. But, this is really weird.

There's... I mean, this is due to the popularity of the movie, and the way the movie ends, or the way the novel ends, either way there's no place or need for a sequel.

I mean, the breakout popular character from the novel / movie is dead anyway.

That said, I really don't see this happening anyway. Maybe a script'll get kicked around, but at the end of the day I doubt it'll really be made.
« Last Edit: 05 February, 2010, 05:36:52 AM by PsychoGoatee »

HOO-HAA

  • Member
  • Posting Machine
  • ***
  • Posts: 1025
    • View Profile
    • Wayne Simmons (Sci-Fi and Horror Author)
Re: WATCHMEN 2?
« Reply #3 on: 07 February, 2010, 12:05:34 AM »
They might get better mileage out of a prequel... like the recent console game. That sure as hell wasn't written by Moore.

Even if looking at it all objectively, and without passion or respect, I just don't think you could do any justice at all to a sequel...

It all reminds me of the whole Kenneth Johnston thing with the V franchise. Only recently, Johnston wrote *his* sequel to the original mini-series, ignoring the entire 'Final Battle' story as well as the (admittedly god-awful) TV series that followed.

There's a possibility Moore could come out of the woodwork and do something like that after everyone and their ma's had a pop at Watchmen sequels. Now, wouldn't that be fun?!   

maryanddavid

  • Member
  • Posting Machine
  • ***
  • Posts: 1133
    • View Profile
Re: WATCHMEN 2?
« Reply #4 on: 07 February, 2010, 01:03:57 AM »
I was surprised by this, but I suppose the fact that the film was reasonably good and the book is great, a sequel/prequel was alway on the cards. There was a Top Ten sequel, which im sure you all know about and im sure was great, but at the end of the day what is remembered?

Let them bring out all all of the prequels they want, in ten years time its only the original that will still be in print. Levitz has always being painted as a bit of a #### but thats a different angle. looking forward to the Sandman sequel already.

David
What do you mean you havent bought the new Tales from the Emerald Isle, shame on you. Go right now to http://www.hiberniabook.blogspot.com/

vzzbux

  • Member
  • Battle Hardened War Robot
  • ****
  • Posts: 4958
    • View Profile
Re: WATCHMEN 2?
« Reply #5 on: 07 February, 2010, 08:08:17 AM »
Let sleeping dogs lie. The only person for Watchmen is Moore. Nobody knows what goes on in his head and are never going to emulate it.







V
http://uk.virginmoneygiving.com/fundraiser-web/fundraiser/showFundraiserProfilePage.action?userUrl=RobertNicholls1
Drokking since 1972

Peace is a lie, there's only passion.
Through passion, I gain strength.
Through strength I gain power.
Through power, I gain victory.
Through victory, my chai